A hot topic in insurance claims is how to handle depreciation and depreciating labor. There is wide disagreement about labor costs versus materials in building repairs. This is important for insurers and policyholders, as it affects how claims are paid.
The Debate
On one hand, some people think only materials should be depreciated. They argue that materials wear out over time, so they lose value. This could include items like shingles, nails, and underlayment. But labor is a service and doesn’t get old or worn out, so it shouldn’t lose value. Others believe both labor and materials should be depreciated together. They say labor is as important as materials in repairs. Ignoring labor in depreciation can lead to unfair and inflated claim payouts.
Our Position: We think separating labor and materials in depreciation is illogical. Hear us out.
The Case for Depreciating Only Materials
Advocates for depreciating only materials argue that materials are physical assets. These assets naturally wear down and lose value over time. Roofing shingles, nails, and underlayment are tangible building components. Over time, they are subjected to weather, moisture, and temperature changes. These factors lead to inevitable deterioration, resulting in a reduction in their value. Thus, materials are depreciated accordingly. Depreciation is traditionally applied to assets that experience wear and tear. Shingles might become brittle and lose effectiveness after years of exposure to weather. Depreciating these materials accounts for their diminished utility and value over time. Proponents argue that labor, unlike materials, does not undergo physical deterioration. Labor is a service rendered at a particular point in time. Since it is not a tangible asset, it does not degrade in the same manner as physical materials. Therefore, they contend, labor should not be subject to depreciation.
Illustrative examples again include roofing shingles. They can crack, curl, and lose granules over time. This reduces their effectiveness and value. Nails and fasteners, though small, are essential components in construction. They can corrode or lose their holding power over time, justifying their depreciation. The protective layer beneath roofing shingles is the underlayment. It also degrades over time due to moisture and temperature fluctuations.
It is easy to acknowledge a reduced functional value of these materials. The core of the argument is that materials are the elements that age and deteriorate. Materials lose their value. Since labor is a one-time effort that does not degrade, it should not be depreciated.
The Case for Depreciating Labor and Materials
Proponents of depreciating both labor and materials argue differently. They contend that labor is an integral part of the value of any repair or construction project. Labor is essential to the creation and maintenance of building components. The skills and efforts of workers contribute significantly to the final product. Without labor, materials alone would not result in a functional building component. Therefore, both elements should be considered together when assessing depreciation.
Depreciating both labor and materials ensures consistency in claim settlements. This approach provides a standardized method for calculating depreciation. Standardization reduces the potential for disputes and ensures fairness. The value of a repair or construction project includes both the materials and the labor. Complex installations bear this out. An HVAC system installation involves labor that is as important as the materials. Depreciating both components ensures a fair assessment of the system’s value over time. Custom construction projects, such as cabinetry or intricate woodwork, require significant labor. Depreciating only the materials would overlook the substantial value added by skilled labor.
The Illogic of Separating Labor and Materials in Depreciation
Separating labor and materials for building repair claims is illogical and unfair. Building components are systems. These systems require both labor and materials to become functional realities. It is illogical to separate these two elements. They are inherently intertwined in the construction and repair processes. Installing a roof involves materials like shingles, nails, and underlayment. But also requires skilled labor to ensure proper installation. Depreciating only the materials ignores the critical role of labor. Labor is required to create a functional roof. Building walls, foundations, and other structural elements involve both materials and labor. The functionality and value of these components depends on the application of labor.
Let’s now examine the cost of a washing machine. It also includes the cost of materials. This can include metal, plastic, and electronics. There is an additional cost involved in assembling these components at the factory. Similarly, the cost of a refrigerator comes from both the materials and the labor at the factory. Roof shingles are made from raw materials like asphalt and fiberglass. But their value also includes the labor required to manufacture them. Advocates for depreciating only materials argue that only physical components degrade over time. This perspective ignores the labor involved in producing these materials at the factory.
Expanding on this, consider where the raw materials to make shingles and nails come from. These raw materials are produced through labor-intensive processes. The argument that labor should never be depreciated falls apart here.
Labor is involved at every stage of production. From extracting raw materials to manufacturing the final products labor is required. This interconnectedness reveals a flaw in the concept that labor can be excluded from depreciation.
We need a complete approach that may happen to include both labor and materials. This approach does not support depreciating labor, and then depreciating the materials. Rather, the approach recognizes that labor and materials are connected. It also recognizes that actual cash value changes depending on the situation. Sometimes it’s calculated based on age, and other times on obsolescence. We see building components as systems instead of separate parts. Settlements must recognize the true value of the repaired or constructed building systems.
Examples Illustrating the Interconnectedness of Labor and Materials
The installation of a roof is a prime example of the synergy between labor and materials. Roofing shingles, nails, and underlayment are essential materials. But their functionality depends entirely on skilled labor for proper installation. The roof must be able to shed water and last a long time. This can only happen from the work of skilled roofers. Depreciating only materials fails to account for the necessary labor.
Walls, foundations, and other structural elements are similar. They require a combination of materials like concrete, steel, and wood. They also require a significant labor input. These structures require strength and stability. This can only happen from the work of construction professionals.
Custom-built features such as cabinetry and intricate woodwork involve significant labor. Skilled craftsmen invest time and expertise to create these unique elements. Components like this will add substantial value to a property.
In each of these cases, depreciating only the materials would significantly undermine the principle of indemnity.
Still not convinced? Consider these three factors that will always justify depreciating labor:
Technological Advancements:
New Installation Methods: Advances in roofing technology and techniques can render older methods less efficient or obsolete. Workers skilled only in outdated methods may see the value of their labor decrease.
Automation and Tools: The introduction of new tools and automated systems can reduce the need for manual labor or require new skills that older workers may not possess.
Economic and Market Conditions:
Market Demand: Fluctuations in the housing market or construction industry can impact the demand for roof installation services. During economic downturns, the value of labor may decrease due to lower demand for new roofs or repairs.
Regional Variations: Economic conditions in specific regions can also affect labor value. Areas with declining populations or economic hardships may see reduced demand for roofing services.
Regulatory Changes:
Building Codes and Regulations: Changes in building codes and safety regulations can require additional training and certification. Workers who do not keep up with these changes may see their labor value decrease.
Competition:
New Entrants: Increased competition from new workers entering the field or companies offering lower prices can drive down the value of labor.
Experience and Reputation: Experienced roofers with a strong reputation may maintain their labor value better than those with less experience or a poor reputation.
The Practical Implications for Insurance Claims
Depreciation calculations in insurance claims are especially important. The goal of the claims adjuster is to provide fair and equitable compensation. Depreciating both labor and materials is necessary. This applies to building components, appliances, automobiles, and even a complete house. It is warranted under the concept of indemnity. Actual Cash Value payouts reflect the true value of the property prior to damage.
How you arrive at Actual Cash Value is key. Consistency in depreciation calculations is important for fairness across different claims. By applying the same rules to building costs, insurers can avoid inconsistency. This makes the claims process more reliable and predictable. Transparency in how depreciation is calculated helps policyholders understand their claim settlements.
Conclusion
Separating labor and materials in depreciation is not logical. Building components and systems are created through the combination of labor and materials. Depreciating only one aspect overlooks the inherent value added by the other. Recognizing this interconnectedness is critical for accurate and fair claim settlements.
A depreciation method that includes both labor and materials promotes consistency. It creates transparency in the claims process. It helps avoid arbitrary decisions. It ensures that all parties understand how claim values are determined.
There needs to be an integrated approach to depreciation. This might mean that both labor and materials wind up being depreciated. It ensures that the claims process is aligned with indemnity and fairness.
Questions on depreciation? We can help, so contact us!